12 Friday Oct 2012
Posted in Housekeeping
Blogger cl maintains that I reasoned fallaciously in discussion about his “Cult of Gnu” post. His accusation:
If he’s correct, then, the emphasized passage above should correspond to the emphasized passage below:
There is no correspondence; narcissistic atheists, atheists, or narcissism are not so much as mentioned. The accusation that I committed a tu quoque fallacy is false, obviously so.
Blogger cl of the warfareismental.com has posted a critique of a certain atheistic argument. As he describes it: Paraphrased, the …
Presuppositionalism, as I understand it, is the view that Christianity is the only rational worldview. This entails that there is …
Recently, I bought a raggedy copy of The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, edited by Hugh LaFollette. The first essay …
Cl of the blog The Warfare is Mental is engaging in a debate on the evidential problem of evil with blogger …
